I see that there is a lot of chaos surrounding Charlie Kirk's murder.

There are too many negative emotions, which only hurt people.

The fact is that no one can really know what happened,

except those who were truly close to him — and none of us are among them.

The fact is that Charlie is gone, we will never see him again,

and his children now have to live without a father,

while his wife has lost her hero.

I don't believe the story that this was the work of the "white hats."

The man in the white hat standing behind Charlie was simply a good friend.

He didn't signal the shooter.

The oddities seen in the video can easily be explained

by the fact that phones use artificial intelligence when recording,

which often causes distortion and strange image errors.

The ring was supposedly a snap-on ring

that pops off and slides down when hit.

Books can be easily written on Amazon using artificial intelligence

in as little as five minutes,

and published a few hours later.

I see no convincing evidence

that this was a white hat operation

to get Charlie into a witness protection program.

The fact that Erika, his wife, quoted Psalm 46 —

which coincides with entry Q 461: "What makes a good movie? Good actors." —

is not solid evidence.

It could be a sign. I hope it is.

But I don't see any convincing evidence for it.

(David Sorensen)

Related Videos