The first, but not expected to be the last, court case in Romania has begun, with criminal charges being brought over the coercion of COVID injections, which were faked as vaccines, and the health damage caused by the Covid vaccine.
Legal proceedings have also been launched against doctors who recommended the vaccines but were told of their side effects.
A star lawyer from Bucharest, Dr Gheorghe Piperea, announced on Friday that he had filed a lawsuit against the Romanian state, the vaccination centres and the doctors and nurses who injected people in the vaccination centres linked to specific cases.
Dr Gheorghe Piperea, Bucharest lawyer
For the vaccination centres were invariably illegal, as the method of injecting people in these vaccination centres according to globalist protocol was both legally and medically criminal.
The doctors who administered the vaccines, by virtue of their medical oath and professional responsibility, can and SHOULD be prosecuted for intentional professional misconduct endangering human life and even for a series of qualified homicides.
No doctor, no nurse working in a vaccination centre, can argue that he or she acted under superior orders, as this is incompatible with the medical oath and the responsibility of the duties of a health professional.
Under international human rights law, no one, not a single person, may be treated with an unknown experimental drug whose ingredients, effects and side effects have not been properly informed. And nowhere have they been properly informed, because the big pharmaceutical companies, Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, did not disclose these side effects until the beginning of 2022 and under pressure from the courts.
As in the case of the Nuremberg death camps, it is not legally or medically acceptable that the medical intervention, the administration of the experimental serum, was carried out by any medical staff on the instructions of any medical staff, as the medical oath of office fundamentally nullifies this excuse.
All politicians, public figures, doctors, celebrities and media sources involved in COVID vaccine propaganda can be prosecuted for recommending and promoting COVID vaccines.
This is what lawyer Piperea said about the specific cases:
"We have two medical malpractice and vaccine manufacturer liability cases pending.
I have sued both the vaccination centre and the doctors who recommended the vaccination (the complaint also includes the deliberate concealment of contraindications on the patient information leaflet or possible side effects of exposure to other medicines), as well as the vaccine manufacturer.
First case: legal representation of a victim of leg amputation due to thrombosis. This man was healthy and a keen skier. It is a sport he will never play again. His leg was cut off because of the vaccination.
Our second vaccine case in court : paralysis after vaccination, including facial paralysis. She has a job where she has to present a pleasant appearance. She no longer has one. Let no one try to deny that such a thing is required in Romania. We are a cruel society, where money is made on the backs of 'little people' who are very easily replaced by other, younger workers if they do not suit the employer.
I have asked for financial compensation for the medication - the side effects of the 'free' vaccine are extremely expensive and take a lifetime to treat - and for the loss of my job.
We also asked for moral damages: one million euros each.
Acceptance fees are minimal. No stamp duty. Processes can take 3-4 years.
The day will come when influencers, technocrats, media and social networks will pay, at least morally, for the Nazi evil they have perpetrated on the world during the pandemic, for our 'safety'.
Addendum: Considering the scepticism or fear of many commentators about the declaration signed at the time of vaccination, I submit the following: a declaration that apparently exempts the manufacturer and the vaccination centre/medical staff from liability has no legal value, since Law 240/2004, art. Article 240/2004 states that any indemnity clause (which removes the manufacturer's liability for defects in its product or service) is considered unwritten, i.e. non-existent; moreover, it is a declaration obtained by force, emotional and legal blackmail, i.e. psychological violence, which is null and void as a defect in consent.
So don't follow the defeatists and do-gooders who encourage passivity."
There is a strong chance that the precedent-setting denunciations and court case will set off a massive avalanche in Romania.
